﻿<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>UTalk Marketing Forums / UTalk Marketing Forums / Gossip / ADVERTISING </title><generator>InstantForum.NET v4.1.4</generator><description>UTalk Marketing Forums</description><link>http://www.utalkmarketing.com/forum/</link><webMaster>forums@utalkmarketing.com</webMaster><lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 00:53:46 GMT</lastBuildDate><ttl>20</ttl><item><title>British Television Advertising Craft Awards</title><link>http://www.utalkmarketing.com/forum/Topic821-26-1.aspx</link><description>Any gossip from the BTACA's?  Or just the usual coke induced mashing and shagging in the toilets we all expect from these kind of bashes?</description><pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 15:46:40 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Lala</dc:creator></item><item><title>Lynx TV Commercial</title><link>http://www.utalkmarketing.com/forum/Topic737-26-1.aspx</link><description>The new Lynx TV Commercial is pukey.  The submissive man, who is a la Lynx, naked, acts like a cross between an ape, and a streaker.  Why is it considered necessary, in order to sell a toiletry?  Some of us have imaginations.  The commercial itself, is dire.  The worst one was, a bare backsided man, being ogled by a bimbo, again not needed, to advertise a toiletry.  However The ASA, saw nothing wrong, oddly. Another one was, not preoccupied with bare flesh, in the same way, but had an aggressive bimbo, spraying a product, at a pretty boy.  Somewhat thoughtless.  It is Sods Law, that one seems to see more of this kind of thing, causing an immediate wish, to change channels.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;All their commercials, use superficially good looking, white skinned people, implying, that no one else matters, and is entitled to buy their products, which are cheap, to use such pretensions.  I notice, that women are never featured in the same lack of clothing, in commercials, or other entertainments.  Somewhat sexist.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description><pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 17:11:46 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>neptune</dc:creator></item><item><title>Barbie</title><link>http://www.utalkmarketing.com/forum/Topic582-26-1.aspx</link><description>Why oh why are there Sugarbabes barbies being produced? The Girls Aloud ones were just AWFUL! Enough with this bo****ks! Please!</description><pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 15:25:14 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Kat</dc:creator></item><item><title>Skoda Fabia on Nickelodeon</title><link>http://www.utalkmarketing.com/forum/Topic660-26-1.aspx</link><description>Skoda is rolling out its new ad campaign on Nickelodeon UK for the launch of it's new Fabia car. Is this a good move? Isnt it just encouraging pester power?</description><pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 11:18:33 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>David</dc:creator></item><item><title>Aero ad</title><link>http://www.utalkmarketing.com/forum/Topic556-26-1.aspx</link><description>Does anyone actually get the aero ad? I wonder how much he got paid...</description><pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 12:07:32 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Marketing Queen</dc:creator></item><item><title>Ask: a risky campaign?</title><link>http://www.utalkmarketing.com/forum/Topic532-26-1.aspx</link><description>I'm not sure what people think about the Ask campaign but i heard something funny... Apparently a blogger searched for Google on Ask.com and it pulled up this comment 'Don't be a droid- use different sources of information'. This was next to a picture of a man on puppet strings and a link to Ask.com's anti- Google website.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Naughty naughty!</description><pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 11:18:44 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Kat</dc:creator></item><item><title>Post Office</title><link>http://www.utalkmarketing.com/forum/Topic477-26-1.aspx</link><description>I heard that Mother have just won the Post Office account. Which i know is true. I also heard that it is worth £20 million. Is this true?  </description><pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 14:55:27 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>CM</dc:creator></item><item><title>Carphone Warehouse pulls from Celebrity Big Brother</title><link>http://www.utalkmarketing.com/forum/Topic368-26-1.aspx</link><description>So were they right to pull their sponsorship of the show?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Have they made a stand for morals over missing out on exposure to millions?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What do you think?</description><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 15:53:24 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>BillyB</dc:creator></item><item><title>Who?</title><link>http://www.utalkmarketing.com/forum/Topic283-26-1.aspx</link><description>Which recent lunchtime PR event was so terrible that the presentations over ran by 3 hours and there was only a sandwich and soft drink for lunch?</description><pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 19:28:16 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Antonia</dc:creator></item></channel></rss>