﻿<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>UTalk Marketing Forums / UTalk Marketing Forums / Help &amp; Advice / MEDIA  / Sponsorship v.s. media buys / Latest Posts</title><generator>InstantForum.NET v4.1.4</generator><description>UTalk Marketing Forums</description><link>http://www.utalkmarketing.com/forum/</link><webMaster>forums@utalkmarketing.com</webMaster><lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 20:31:46 GMT</lastBuildDate><ttl>20</ttl><item><title>RE: Sponsorship v.s. media buys</title><link>http://www.utalkmarketing.com/forum/Topic744-11-1.aspx</link><description>I don't in anyway want to criticize what you have wrote, it was interesting to read and pointed out a few things I have never realized. However I see you have spoke a lot about brands and multi million pound businesses. Could anyone answer the same question but not for a large blue chip company but for a corner shop or local fast food takeaway for example?</description><pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 13:23:47 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Simon </dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: Sponsorship v.s. media buys</title><link>http://www.utalkmarketing.com/forum/Topic744-11-1.aspx</link><description>Assessing the relative media value of any given sponsorship is the first thing that we must do when considering investing in sponsorship.  &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But ‘value’ is a concept that becomes increasingly blurred when looking at sponsorship vs traditional media.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;To look at broadcast sponsorship as an example, there are several measures that we could look at allowing us to compare it to traditional media, and therefore come up with a value.   &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Similar to a TV model, we could look at time length and ratings of bumpers in a given sponsorship, and from that arrive at a number of ratings that in media terms equate to a value. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But arguably sponsorship has inherent advantages that boost its value over and above traditional media.  &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sponsorship’s selling point is its ability to add qualities to a brand by association.  &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sponsorship can give credibility to a brand, or can take a flagging brand and make it cool again - Baileys used Sex and the City to great effect to do just that.  &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Low interest categories use sponsorship to give a brand prominence, a good example being the extortionate amount that AIG have paid to put their name on Manchester United’s shirts; in fact you can be almost certain that every finance brand will be involved in sports sponsorship of some form.  &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Brands in categories with little tangible differentiation will use sponsorship to stand out – we only need look at the mobile market to see how brands there have looked to form strong content associations whether that is through film, music or sport.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Whatever content people consume, they are doing so because they enjoy it and it has relevance to them. Likeability and relevance is ultimately what a brand is gaining (over and above traditional media) by sponsoring something.  &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ross Minton&lt;BR&gt;Sponsorship Manager, OMD Fuse&lt;BR&gt;</description><pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 16:38:12 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Ross Minton</dc:creator></item><item><title>Sponsorship v.s. media buys</title><link>http://www.utalkmarketing.com/forum/Topic744-11-1.aspx</link><description>How to you measure the value of sponsorship v.s.media buys?</description><pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 13:57:19 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>CM</dc:creator></item></channel></rss>